Autor
| wiki
|
wolf_
 msx legend Mensajes: 4827 | Publicado: Noviembre 02 2005, 01:11   |
|
|
BiFi msx guru Mensajes: 3142 | Publicado: Noviembre 02 2005, 07:31   |
Nice list already... though still far from complete...
|
|
tfh msx addict Mensajes: 496 | Publicado: Noviembre 02 2005, 12:26   |
Hmmmzzz..
Maybe Sandy should find a way to output his generation-msx database to Wiki for this  |
|
BiFi msx guru Mensajes: 3142 | Publicado: Noviembre 02 2005, 13:14   |
I don't think he will do that  |
|
Sonic_aka_T
 msx guru Mensajes: 2269 | Publicado: Noviembre 02 2005, 14:20   |
I don't think he should do that  |
|
BiFi msx guru Mensajes: 3142 | Publicado: Noviembre 02 2005, 16:53   |
that too...
|
|
Niles msx professional Mensajes: 519 | Publicado: Noviembre 02 2005, 17:36   |
|
|
BodyHammeR msx addict Mensajes: 492 | Publicado: Noviembre 03 2005, 16:55   |
Those wiki pages have plenty of errors and omissions.
That said: Just don't ever take anything on the internet seriously  |
|
Niles msx professional Mensajes: 519 | Publicado: Noviembre 03 2005, 17:39   |
[joke mode]
yep... I prefer MS Encarta 
[/joke mode] |
|
AuroraMSX
 msx master Mensajes: 1277 | Publicado: Noviembre 04 2005, 09:30   |
Quote:
| [joke mode]
yep... I prefer MS Encarta 
[/joke mode]
|
And what does 'Ms Niles' say about that?  |
|
Niles msx professional Mensajes: 519 | Publicado: Noviembre 04 2005, 12:59   |
Mr...
As far as I know, every article "posted" in wikipedia is fully reviewed by "someone". I don't know the deepth of this review but, in general, the articles I read there were always correct (I used other references to validate).
Anyway, all texts are subject to their authors and they could be not trusted of course... including mathematics
The list that Wolf_ posted it's short but nice, in my opinion. Isn't it? |
|
AuroraMSX
 msx master Mensajes: 1277 | Publicado: Noviembre 05 2005, 12:32   |
Quote:
| As far as I know, every article "posted" in wikipedia is fully reviewed by "someone". I don't know the deepth of this review but, in general, the articles I read there were always correct (I used other references to validate).
|
To quote an unknown source:
(At Wikipedia ...) you can't tell the difference between an article edited by 1 expert and 20 jackasses, and an article edited by 21 jackasses.
|
|
Niles msx professional Mensajes: 519 | Publicado: Noviembre 05 2005, 19:52   |
It could be... in any case you could say the same for any text (including printed encyclopaedias). I mean, you can read some article is "writed" by some expert, but you don't really know his experience.
e.g.: MS Encarta
and for some info I know well, wikipedia give correct information. |
|
Yukio msx professional Mensajes: 828 | Publicado: Noviembre 13 2005, 06:25   |
|
|
wolf_
 msx legend Mensajes: 4827 | Publicado: Noviembre 13 2005, 14:13   |
hm.. for a start we could create a list right here.. not every msx composer program is a tracker..
|
|
|
|
|