Autor
| Question about arrays
|
DemonSeed
msx professional
Mensajes: 903 |  Publicado: Febrero 10 2008, 19:08 |
This will result in an error of type "redimensioned array".
I fail to see why.
Should I "CLEAR" something? I don't really understand.  |
|
ARTRAG
msx master
Mensajes: 1578 | Publicado: Febrero 10 2008, 19:26 |
just a try:
dimension to "10" instead of "9" the arrays in line 1150 and leave the rest as it is.
let me know if you get the same error
|
|
DemonSeed
msx professional
Mensajes: 903 | Publicado: Febrero 10 2008, 19:34 |
Yeah, same error...
When I "REM" line 1150-1180 however, no error occurs.
But it's nice to have bullets in a shooting game, right?  |
|
ARTRAG
msx master
Mensajes: 1578 | Publicado: Febrero 10 2008, 19:36 |
try to comment only lines 1160-1180
and tell me
it could be an xbasic issue
|
|
DemonSeed
msx professional
Mensajes: 903 | Publicado: Febrero 10 2008, 19:41 |
 You're right!!! *swears* |
|
ARTRAG
msx master
Mensajes: 1578 | Publicado: Febrero 10 2008, 19:43 |
Easy solution
Move all the DIM statements
Before any instruction
This holds in any Xbasic block if you use _turbo on /off
instead of _run
|
|
DemonSeed
msx professional
Mensajes: 903 | Publicado: Febrero 10 2008, 19:47 |
The DIM statements you see on the screenshot are stated directly after the _TURBO ON command.
It's actually in line 1120.
Moving them before the _TURBO ON command would mean that all variables will be set to zero again.
|
|
ARTRAG
msx master
Mensajes: 1578 | Publicado: Febrero 10 2008, 19:49 |
I mean this :
move the code at lines 1160-1180 after any dim statement
|
|
ARTRAG
msx master
Mensajes: 1578 | Publicado: Febrero 10 2008, 19:50 |
the dim statements have to be on the top of the xbasic block
|
|
DemonSeed
msx professional
Mensajes: 903 | Publicado: Febrero 10 2008, 19:52 |
YESSS, it works! Thanks again!!!  |
|
[D-Tail]
online
msx guru
Mensajes: 2980 | Publicado: Febrero 10 2008, 22:24 |
Speaking of which, DemonSeed, why weren't you @ Mariënberg, last Saturday? I had my X/NBASIC books and software projects on me...
|
|
DemonSeed
msx professional
Mensajes: 903 | Publicado: Febrero 10 2008, 22:58 |
Oh yeah... I'm sorry about that.
My work has been asking so much of me lately that I wasn't physically able to come out of bed before 12:00 AM on any saturday....
Same reason why I had to miss the fair in Nijmegen...  |
|
[D-Tail]
online
msx guru
Mensajes: 2980 | Publicado: Febrero 11 2008, 09:13 |
That's too bad, really. Next fair it is  |
|
AuroraMSX
msx master
Mensajes: 1224 | Publicado: Febrero 11 2008, 14:19 |
Ouch, what a piece of code  . I think you'd be better off using a 2-dimensional array: 1150 DIM B(9,9), E(21,8)
1160 FOR BI=0 TO 9: FOR BB=0 TO 9: B(BI,BB)=1: NEXT BB,BI
1170 RESTORE 1180: FOR BB=0 TO 9: READ Z: B(4,BB)=Z: NEXT: ' B(4,x) used to be BD(x)
1180 DATA 0, 0, 0, -2, 2, -2, 2, -2, 2 (Or something along that line...) |
|
DemonSeed
msx professional
Mensajes: 903 | Publicado: Febrero 11 2008, 14:40 |
Quote:
| Ouch, what a piece of code
|
Why, thank you. Are you offering to code the game instead? 
Quote:
| I think you'd be better off using a 2-dimensional array: 1150 DIM B(9,9), E(21,8)
1160 FOR BI=0 TO 9: FOR BB=0 TO 9: B(BI,BB)=1: NEXT BB,BI
1170 RESTORE 1180: FOR BB=0 TO 9: READ Z: B(4,BB)=Z: NEXT: ' B(4,x) used to be BD(x)
1180 DATA 0, 0, 0, -2, 2, -2, 2, -2, 2 (Or something along that line...)
|
Thanks man, interesting suggestion.
Is it really that better to use DATA lines? |
|
|
|
|
