What’s the purpose of this thread? I feel like a lot of people are broadcasting their wishes expecting there to be an imaginary person who is supposed to actually implement all this 
.
And even though I also wish I could rewrite history and address some gripes, if someone would spend all that effort to make a “better” V9958, I’m not sure what good that would do me, because I’m writing software for existing MSX computers. I’d rather see V9958 FPGA reproductions be as faithful and accurate as possible, and an FPGA V9990 clone for more demanding applications (seeing that V9990 chips are becoming harder to find).
Well it’s almost Christmas 
. Just an replacement would be fine for keeping existing MSX computer alive.
Perhaps same functionality but with higher speed.
Not sure if a ‘turbo-VDP’ would create all kinds of timing issues.
What’s the purpose of this thread? I feel like a lot of people are broadcasting their wishes expecting there to be an imaginary person who is supposed to actually implement all this .
Why not? Maybe someone with the necessary technical skills could feel inspired.
What’s the purpose of this thread? I feel like a lot of people are broadcasting their wishes expecting there to be an imaginary person who is supposed to actually implement all this .
Why not? Maybe someone with the necessary technical skills could feel inspired.
How many visitors of MSX.org mastered VHDL or Verilog? Not very likely it will happen but I really hope I’m wrong in that aspect.
How many visitors of MSX.org mastered VHDL or Verilog? Not very likely it will happen but I really hope I’m wrong in that aspect.
Well KdL, HRA!, Eugeny, Aquijacks, maxis to name a few… It’s certainly a skill that certain people have. V9958 FPGA emulation is being worked on in the context of the 1chipMSX project by the first two gentlemen, and maxis had his Procyon VDP project a few years ago as well.
