"palette mirror addresses" ? Never heard of it.
EDIT: Hum... ok... I've already heard of it before ^^
The program has been updated:
-Interlaced images added
-Save as MAG added
It would be super nice to have image file formats on MRC's wiki.
I plan to add many image file loader to MSXgl but the hardest part is just to find information about formats. :-/
Is it possible to download samples of such images for tests somewhere?
Sorry for the delay to reply. You can find plenty of files in the MSX section of the RetroGallery.
You can also download many MSX Pixel Art Collections at my website.
-Save as MAG added
Finally a modern tool to save MSX MAG files!! Thank you so much!! 🎉🎉
Could you please also make it possible to save MAG images of any dimensions? (IOW, not only fullscreen, but also smaller or bigger than the screen)
trivia: Images bigger than the screen are called banners, AKA scrollers
I'm really impressed. This is the first tool that could nearly recreate a SCREEN12 image from a PNG generated directly from that image.
IOW, TEST.SCC -> test.png -> TestRecreated.SCC
It's still not perfect, but it came very close. If it can reach a perfect recreation, we'll finally be able to retouch SCREEN12 images on modern image editors without loss of quality.
On SCREEN10 it fails badly to recreate an image though. I suspect that's because it doesn't use the RGB colors, but only the YJK colors.
Could you please also make it possible to save MAG images of any dimensions?
Ok, I will add this possibility in the next release.
TEST.SCC -> test.png
Could you show me your TEST.SCC and test.png files?
Could you show me your TEST.SCC and test.png files?
I'll link the SCREEN12 test files here. To generate the PNG files, I used both the DaDither built-in import function (by dragging the .SCC file to its source area then saving the PNG), or by using RECOIL. Curiously, I get different regenerated SCC files from the two cases.
https://tomseditor.com/gallery/i/51671
https://tomseditor.com/gallery/i/51679
https://tomseditor.com/gallery/i/40370
https://tomseditor.com/gallery/i/40317
https://tomseditor.com/gallery/i/34930
https://tomseditor.com/gallery/i/34930
https://tomseditor.com/gallery/i/34934
https://tomseditor.com/gallery/i/34932
The differences can be subtle because, as I mentioned, DaDither comes very close to being able to recreate the image. But the problem is that the errors accumulate in consecutive regenerations, making the process lossy. Not ideal for image edition.
And these are the SCREEN10 images I used with the same recreation process. But, as you can see, for this mode the results here are pretty poor. The images come out completely chewed.
https://tomseditor.com/gallery/i/34913
https://tomseditor.com/gallery/i/34904
https://tomseditor.com/gallery/i/34907
I hope you used a Pixel aspect ratio of 1:1 and a dithering method None?