Interesting Announcement at TNI site

If Bazix had been able to keep the issues between the MSX Resource Center and Guyver separate from their function as Bazix, things would have been different. So, as the press release states, look at them if you have a problem with it. One just can't suddenly start to have objections against the main developer of a project. I can assure you none of us in TNI likes this decision.

~Grauw

Please continue the discussion, but let's get one fact straight: Bazix has never done any business with TNI whatsoever, and from what I understand from this "pressrelease" TNI is not willing to do so eiher.

I'm not so sure about that one based on Grauws' comments.

I think it's a shame Patriek feels the need to seek public attention with all this again. As the former project manager of Guru Logic I have tried, after the MRC vs GuyveR800 conflict, to create a situation in which this ambitious, promising project could be finished after all. I decided to step out of the project, for the project's sake, giving GuyveR800 all opportunity to arrange the completion of the project (which was very close to completion) in a way he felt comfortable with. Unfortunately he chose to blame his lack of motivation on the conflict he had with the MRC. It is a shame, but I think there is very little that can be done about it anymore. With this we have lost the first (and largest) chance of releasing a new, commercial MSX game in the 21st century. Something the entire MSX community could have been proud of. (C64 eat your heart out!). It's a great loss to all of us.

As for the MRC part of it: I feel hurt by Mars2000you's words, stating that the MRC can not take critics. You only have to browse the MRC news and forum archives (and our email inboxes) to see that nothing could be further from the truth. We are not very co-operative when people call us names and demand ridiculous things for no particular reason whatsoever, though, which is what we feel has happened between GuyveR800 and the MRC. As this entire situation highly demotivated us in continuing with the MRC, we decided it had to come to a stop when GuyveR800 went way out of line once again, without any intention of taking anything he said back. You have probably noticed the MRC forums have become a lot less agressive ever since. As with GLC, it is a shame it all had to come to this, but I feel I have done everything I could to prevent it from happening.

As in the above mentioned thread, MRC answers are extremely defensive and aren't open to any suggestion when they feel that their approach of the reality could be in serious danger if all the sides of the reality should be examined by a third party.

As we say in French : "Seule la vérité blesse"